About Me

Name: whozis
Location: Greenup, KY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Shame On Me!


There is an old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me!"
In other words, we need to learn quickly when others are abusing us. If they do it once, it is understandable that we might naively be duped. If we let them do it to us again, we can only blame ourselves for not learning from our bad experience.
 
All I can say is, "Shame on us!"
 
Bush/Obama gave us TARP, and we accepted it. Shame on them! Then, Obama gave us The Stimulus boondoggle, and we accepted that. He also gave us The Bailouts of banks, insurance companies, and car companies, and we sat by as those were thrust upon us.
 
Now he is shoving Obamacare down our throats, and it's about time that we speak up. It should have been done with the Stimulus/Porkulus bill. Some of us tried. I, for one, sought out the TEA parties, and attended an impromptu gatheirng locally. We had about 100 people attend a gathering that was thrown together at the last minute by a timid local lady, who nervously canceled it, and then  when the day was almost upon us, reluctantly rescheduled it.
 
Who attended? A lot of local people---Democrats, Independents, and Republicans--who were upset at the path that our federal government is taking. One young man volunteered to speak. Unfortunately, he was a Libertarian zealot, spouting anti-government rhetoric and denying that the government has the right to tax us at all. Some began to mutter under their breaths, and a few even walked away in disgust. Why? Because we came together, not to savage the government, or to quit paying taxes, but to put the brakes on what we saw as the loss of the freedoms assured us by the Constitution of the USA and the founding fathers. We wanted to put the brakes on out-of-control spending by the Obama administration. Many of us left just as frustrated and unchanneled as when we arrived.
 
We were not "astro-turf", as silly Pelosi likes to label us. We were not right-wing nuts wanting to damage our country and its government. We were frustrated citizens from all major parties and all across the political spectrum.
 
The administration did not listen. We were falsely branded, marginalized, and told recently by our President to shut up and step aside. He said that he does not want to hear from us.
 
Now, the mainstream media is going nuts, calling us "crazies", "Nazis", fake grass-roots plants organized by the Republicans and their cronies. The politicians and the pundits decry the loud tones in which people now speak, the anger that is evident when they speak, and the shouts that drown out the politicians and their "plants" when all they do is spout the Democrat talking points. These people are going there to express their anger at being silenced, their frustration that Washington, DC, is not listening, and their fear that our freedoms are rapidly being stripped from us.
 
These loud protestors are afraid for their futures, and the futures of their children, and grandchildren, who will be required to fund these extravagant and exorbitant expenditures by our government. They are afraid for their parents and grandparents, who will likely be denied proper healthcare under the Obama "Healthcare" plan for "managed" health care costs.
 
It is shameful that it has taken us this long to be loud and vocal. We should have done this back when The Stimulus/Porkulus plan was percolating. After all, we had already been bamboozled by the TARP fiasco.
 
Don't stop speaking out now. If we tone down and quiet down as Obama and his minions would like us to do, they will say, "See, no one is opposed to our plans. Everyone wants us to do this. Remember, they voted for hope and change."
 
Yes, Mr. President, a majority voted for hope and change. They didn't bargain for, nor did they anticipate, massive change that is designed to destroy our freedoms and bankrupt our country. They did not hope for socialism.
 
You have given us more change than we bargained for, and instead of hope, you have given us hopelessness.
 
Shame on you, President Obama! You continue to fool us time and time again.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am Becoming An Activist


The Democrats are in full war mode on the citizens of the United States of America. It seems that we citizens have the unmitigated gall to question the Chosen One and his wisdom. Apparently, a majority of us don't want to live in a socialist country, and that is why that we choose to stay here instead of moving to Canada or Europe. Or Russia, or Cuba, or Venezuela.
 
The Democrats tell us that we must be quiet and let them proclaim that the nationalized healthcare program that they favor is what America needs. We must not ask about the cost and who will pay for it--and how! We must not question why the Representatives and Senators who will vote on it and the President who will sign it into law do not see fit to read it first. We must not point out key provisions that will take away our privacy and freedom, turning the most intimate parts of our lives over to governmental control.
 
If we wish to speak out, we must not contact each other beforehand, blog about it, write in a forum, email anyone, tweet, post, IM, text or otherwise be in touch with those of like mind. We must not ride together to a townhall meeting, and God forbid we should take a bus! We must not sign a petition put out by a conservative group, or become an online member of any such group. If we do any of this, we are manufacturing our frustration and anger with the Democrats' nationalized health control plan, and our criticisms and questions are illegitimate. We must not be allowed to speak.
 
I was not an activist. However, with the excesses coming out of Washington, DC, I am becoming one. I am blogging. I am posting. I am emailing. I am signing petitions. I am becoming an online member of various causes and groups in order to receive their emails alerting me to Washington, DC, excesses.
 
Does that make my concerns illegitimate? Does that mean my voice must be silenced?
 
Feel free to copy this blog, or the URL, and email it to Obama and his Chicago bullies at flag@whitehouse.gov
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin's "Dumb Mistake"

The ether is alive with the head-and-finger-wagging talking heads discussing Sarah Palin's decision to resign as governor of Alaska.
 
There is a general consensus among both Democrats and Republicans that she has made a grave mistake, and has sabotaged her political future for good. They call her a quitter.
 
You know what really bothers me? Every time that the Democrats and their bullhorn known as the Mainstream Media run down a popular conservative figure, the Republican talking heads and news analysts jump on the same bandwagon. Shameful! The conservative pundits, commentators, and bloggers become an echo chamber for the Democrats.
 
Who loses? The ordinary Americans, especially those who are conservative. Their voices get lost in the cacophony of naysayers, critics, and cynics. When it is all said and done, the Beltway resonates with the sounds of its own voices, drowning out the regular citizen.
 
That really bothers me!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Save the Country -- Get Your Children Out of Public Schools!

 

Years ago, I warned that many of our society's ills were brought on by what was being taught in our public schools. Many of my friends scoffed at the idea. With the availability of the Internet to most, I found it easy to access the information that bore out my conclusions.

The site of the National Education Association, or NEA, was, and is, a goldmine of information. For instance, several years ago, I found a page, now gone, on their site that advocated that teachers encourage their teenage students to experiment with sexual intercourse, including homosexual relationships.

We have a powerful teachers' union, the NEA, telling its members--teachers--to promote promiscuous sexual relations among our teenagers. They were to emphasize the joys of homosexual relations to those same teens--our children, and grandchildren.

First of all, since when do teachers have the right to promote irresponsible and ungodly activities among our young children? Second, what gives a union the right to tell its teachers what to teach? Isn't a union a bargaining unit, formed to negotiate pay and benefits for workers? Why does a union decide what is to be taught to our children?

Recently, the NEA has delved deeper into this insidious and malicious malpractice by pushing homosexuality onto all of our students. Here are several links that show the depths to which this union has descended. Be careful to note the use of key words or phrases that are code words for what they really mean. For instance, diversity is used to cloak the fact that they support homosexuals and the homosexual lifestyle, including sexual relations and activities. Another word is safe. We all want our children to be safe, right? But when the teachers' union speaks of a safe school, they are talking about promoting homosexuality. They also advocate against bullying. That sounds like a good idea, because we don't want big kids shoving little kids around, do we? But in reality, when this union, the NEA, talks about bullying, they are talking about promoting homosexuality.

See the following links for examples. They were not easy to find. I had to drill down several levels to find them, they were so well hidden from a casual, perfunctory perusal of their Web site.

http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/mf_glbtfocus06.pdf

How to make schools "safe" for GBLT students.


http://www.nea.org/tools/30420.htm

Uses unrealistic statistics from a homosexual Web site.

http://www.nea.org/tools/30411.htm

Promoting "social orientation and gender identity".

This promotion of homosexuality is only one of the devices used by this group to tear apart the American way of family life that we have known for so long. They are also teaching our young people to embrace socialism when it comes to various facets of life. They teach them that the world owes them a living, and that all should share equally in the world's resources. They take away responsibility and self-discipline, rewarding mediocrity.

These are the teachings of communists and socialists, who infiltrated the public school system in the 1950s through the 1970s. They are now firmly entrenched as the voice of the public school system, calling the shots on what is taught and the behavior modification that they impose on all students to bring them into line with the union's socialist/communist thinking.

As each year's graduates hit the pavement of America's streets, looking for work, they carry with them these socialist and communist ideas. It has been going on for about forty years, and it is getting worse. We see the results of this brainwashing in the outcomes of recent elections, where the young vote overwhelmingly for those who run for election under the doctrines and policies of the socialists.

We owe these attitudes to the NEA, the teachers' union, and their stranglehold on the public education system. My advice? Get your children into home-schooling or private schooling without delay. Then, demand that the public schools return to teaching the basics, rather than brainwashing the children into the socialist/communist mode of thinking.

It would pay you to read the declarations on the Web page of the Communist Party USA:

http://www.cpusa.org/article/static/13/

Yes, it takes several minutes to read, and sounds like Utopia, but pay attention to all of the words, especially those toward the end, advocating violent revolution.

The mess we are in today, culturally, has its roots in the communist infiltration of our public school system fifty or more years ago. We are now reaping the fruits of those early efforts.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Decline of America

 
I have sadly watched the decline of America. It was slow at first, but now the decline is at full throttle.

One of the first, most noticeable was the "Dumbing (Down) of America" in our public education system. When it was noticed by the "progressive" liberal Democrats that some students performed better than others in school--as if it had never been noticed before--they decided that, rather than working with the failing students so that their educations would improve, they sought to "level the playing field" by lowering educational standards. In other words, instead of increasing the overall education of all, the regressive liberal Democrats decreased the overall education for all students. There was a heavy push toward this in the 1960s, and it has continued since. We are now reaping the spoiled fruits of this experiment, as we see uneducated adults trying to make their way in the world. Our country is suffering as a result of the inability to communicate correctly in reading, writing and speaking. This "equality for all" educational system has also fueled an aggressive resentment toward those who have by those who have not.

Now, President Barack Hussein Obama promises to do a similar "leveling" of health care. Why should the rich be able to pay for expensive health procedures when the poor cannot? Is his answer to provide the best of care for everyone? No, the answer of Obama and his eager Democrats in Congress is to provide mediocre health care to everyone. I just read an article today about the Canadian healthcare system, which is often held up by the regressive liberal Democrats as the ideal system. One lady was alarmed that she had to wait a year for an MRI for an injury that was plaguing her. She spent hundreds of dollars to bypass the public healthcare system and have the MRI at a private healthcare enterprise. This was fine, right? No! Such providers were sued because they were providing a service that was not available to all, which is to say, even to those who cannot pay. It was claimed that this was not fair to the poorer citizens, who had to seek their care in the public, government-run system. This is the system the regressives want for Americans. Instead of the best healthcare for all, they want a "fair", mediocre system for all.

We can see it coming in other areas, as well. Why should one area of the country have access to more water than another? Their answer, by extrapolating the way that they think and applying it to this resource, would be to restrict water to all in the name of fairness.

Why should some people live in better houses than others? Put them all into little cubicles in highrise apartment buildings.

Why should some be able to afford bigger, or nicer, automobiles to drive? Why not put everyone on mass transit?

Why should some have more interesting or rewarding jobs than others? Why not create a lottery to award the jobs to whomever wins, regardless of whether or not they will be good at the job? Better yet, put everyone in menial, labor-intensive jobs?

Why should some live in better neighborhoods than others? Let all live in slums.

Why should one have better quality food than another? Make all eat the same cheap, basic foods.

Why should some live longer than others? Set an age by which all are euthanized, if they are still alive at that age.

Does this sound far-fetched to you? Not to me. It's the kind of world that our regressive liberal Democrats wish for America--the land of the fair and the home of the equal.

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Department of Justice Will Work Tirelessly...


Eric Holder's Department of Justice "will work tirelessly to determine the full involvement of any and all actors in this horrible crime, and to ensure that anyone who played a role in the offense is prosecuted to the full extent of federal law" per Loretta King, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the DoJ.
 
 
Thankfully, the DoJ is going after the vast right wing conspiracy (Republicans and/or conservatives) who have worked together to bring about this murder. At least, that is the way that the DoJ seems to be playing it. They seem to be pretty certain that every person who believes that the murder of the innocent unborn should stop is in on this murder. I heard folks blaming Bill O'Reilly for it, and others blaming the entire anti-abortion populace as co-conspirators.
 
Using that yardstick, we can blame all Democrats/Liberals/Progressives/Communists/Socialists for every attack on a policeman, a military member, a bank, a laboratory, a housing development, or any other attack by a left-wing extremist on any person or property.
 
But, then, this is the same DoJ that dismissed the lawsuit against the New Black Panther thugs who intimidated voters!
 
See the YouTube video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
 
Michelle Malkin blogs about the DoJ dismissal of the suit here:
 
Read the Washington Post story here:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/?feat=home_cube_position1&
 
So, while the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense gets away with voter intimidation, the DoJ goes after the vast right wing conspiracy's role in the Tiller murder.
 
Corrupt Department of Justice = 1, American citizens - 0.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Keep Your Eye On The Left Hand!

 
As I have warned several times already, keep your eyes on Obama's left hand!
 
With his right hand, he has nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that she thinks that the purpose of the courts is to legislate law rather than upholding it, all of the mainstream media, as well as the Fox News channel, and all of the right-wing media, are yammering on about how that her life is a compelling story!
 
Those who do see beyond the love for the compelling story are still hung up on the problems that the nomination has created for Republicans. They say that Republicans cannot oppose the nomination of Ms. Sotomayor because they will be labeled racist by the Democrats and the MainStream Media.
 
Why not do the honest thing? Republicans need to state unequivocally that they are not against the nomination because Sotomayor is Hispanic, but because she will not judge according to the laws that Congress legislates, and will uphold the US Constitution. They must tell the world that if Obama will nominate a Hispanic judge who will judge according to the Constitution, rather than legislating from the bench, they will happily vote for the nominee. If Obama will send them a nominee who is Hispanic, but is not racist, they will gladly vote for that person.
 
Is that so hard to do? Evidently, because all of the pundits are squealing about how Obama has once again painted the Republicans into a corner!
 
I have stated for years that the Republicans need to reach out to Hispanic and black voters, but for some reason, they will not do so. Yet, many in those two groups--some say a majority--are conservative regarding family values and what makes America great. If this is true, why is it that Republicans cannot reach out to these people on common ground, and show them that they really care about the future of these people?
 
In the meantime, take a stand! Reject the racism and leftist activism that Sotomayor embodies, and ask for a Hispanic nominee who will stand for the rule of law and the groundwork of the Constitution as laid by the founders of this great country!
 
Watch that left hand! What Obama is actually doing is trying to bamboozle the Republicans and push through, not a Hispanic with a compelling life story, but rather an extreme, leftist, activist Supreme Court justice.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservatives Still Aren't Getting It!

Recently I warned about watching Obama's left hand while his right hand is busy. Conservatives still aren't getting it.
 
Just a few minutes ago, I received an email from a conservative blogger who was lamenting that Obama doesn't know how to run a car company. His latest peeve was the demand by the Obama administration that fuel efficiency be increased and emissions be decreased. This blogger complained that this would tack another $1300 onto the price of a new automobile. He wondered how the car companies could stay in business at this rate, and agonized over Obama's lack of ability to run a car company properly.
 
That's what the right hand is doing. What is the left hand doing?
 
Obama and the "progressive" (socialist) Democrats don't want Detroit to succeed. They don't want fossil fuel guzzlers on the road, spewing gases into the atmosphere. Has no conservative been paying attention?
 
What they want are cars that run on electricity or some other non-carbon fuel energy supply. Not only that, but they want mass transit to get cars off the road. What better way to justify mass transit than to make it almost impossible for ordinary people to be able to afford automobiles? May be they figure that with consumers unable to buy cars, they will demand mass transit. At the very least, it gives them the justification to pursue it. Since mass transit has been, by and large, unsuccessful at turning a profit, that is no problem--the federal government will raise everyone's taxes and pay for mass transit for the masses!

A socialist's dream come true!
 
The rich will drive cars, whatever the fuel source may be, and whatever the cost, and the masses will have mass transit!
 
To recap, the socialist Dems don't want a successful automobile industry. That is counter to what they advocate--the abandonment of fossil fuels and the reduction in "greenhouse" gases! Plus mass transit, paid for by the people--willingly or not!
 
Keep watching that left(ist) hand! That's where the real action is taking place!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

If you care about your country, you need to understand what is being done to us by the Democrats and leftists in America. I was recently made aware of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. I wish that I had known about them, and him, many years ago.

For decades, I have been telling people that as a teenager in the 1960s and a young adult in the early 1970s, I remember someone from the radical leftist movement saying that, since their call for violent revolution in America had failed, they would enter all of the country's institutions and bring our way of life down from the inside. They have succeeded, and here is how they did it.

They followed the instructions of Saul Alinsky, and adopted his Rules for Radicals. Below is a summary of those rules:

1 – Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

2 – Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

3 – Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

4 – Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.

5 – Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

6 – A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.

7 – A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment.

8 – Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.

9 – The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

10 – The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

11 – If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.

12 – The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying "You’re right—we don’t know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us."

13 – Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

This is what the Democrats, leftists, socialists, Marxists, Communists, Progressives, and that ilk have done to our country, and our way of life. Under Barack Hussein Obama, their methodology has gone into overdrive. Read the points above one more time, slowly and carefully--your freedoms, your way of life, your country, and possibly your very life, depend upon counteracting and defeating the Democrats.

We must be aware of their tactics, and fight back. One of the most dangerous areas is public education. I have warned of this for decades.

Get your children or grandchildren out of public schools and into private schools, or better yet, if you are capable, home-school them. The leftists have used the public school system to brainwash our students into embracing the socialist way of life. If you don't get them out of there as soon as possible, the poison of the leftists will have left its mark.

Work tirelessly to elect those who will oppose the Democrats and their leftist agenda. Organize, write political electees and your local newspapers, call in to radio programs, call your political electees, hold events, mobilize people to stand up against this onslaught on our freedoms. If you don't counteract their organizing efforts, they will take away everything that we hold dear, while we stand helplessly by and watch it happen.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Is That Cloud Of Smoke Over DC?

 
Have you noticed the cloud of smoke hovering over Washington, DC?
 
No, it is not a new terrorist attack. Well, at least, not external terrorists.
 
It's the smoke from the fires emanating from the pants of the Democrats in the Capitol and the White House. Yep, their pants are all on fire!
 
Pelosi says that she was never notified that waterboarding would be used against the other terrorists--the external ones. The House of Representatives is so filled with smoke, a combination of the smoke that Democrats are blowing blended with the smoke from their pants on fire!
 
Obama said that he would rule, er, lead, in a bi-partisan fashion. Smoke is pouring from the White House! He said that he would eliminate earmarks. The smoke detectors are going crazy. He said that he wanted all students to have choice in education. The sprinklers are activating. He said that he would reign in runaway spending. Call the fire department, the nation's capital is going up in smoke! He says that he wants to keep the country safe. Everyone in DC, shelter in place, and put cloths under the doors to keep the smoke out! No, wait, maybe you ought to flee to the countryside, as it appears that this smoke isn't going away anytime soon.
 
All the liars' pants are one fire! And, no one seems to want to put them out...
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats' Legerdemain

Keep watching Obama's left hand. He is a master of misdirection. While we are watching his right hand, his left hand is busy.

While everyone is screaming about the huge spending bill and the attendant interest that will impoverish our children, Obama and the Democrats are working overtime to ram their social changes down our throats. Truly the huge spending package and its effects are an important subject, as most conservatives acknowledge. Meanwhile, as we are blogging, tea partying and venting about the spending and the taxes, Obama and his Democrats in Congress are using that sleight of hand to take down many of the conservative initiatives of the past.

For instance, the right to life.

Our country's Declaration of Independence reads thusly: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Obama and the Dems have reversed the so-called "Mexico City Policy" started by Ronald Reagan, taken away by Bill Clinton, and was restored by George W. Bush. The Mexico City Policy stated that the U.S. government would not send money to overseas agencies that used abortion as part of so-called "family planning".

Obama is appointing Kathleen Sebelius as head of Health and Human Services. She is so pro-abortion that, as governor of Kansas, she vetoed abortion reform, allowing late-term and partial-birth abortion to continue in her state. 

Obama has appointed Dawn Johnsen, a staunch pro-abortionist and former NARAL attorney, to be the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of the Legal Counsel.

Obama rushed to reverse the Bush policy on embryonic stem cell research. Religious voters insist that using embryos for scientific research is killing a life for the sake of science. Obama says that science has to rule over "politics" -- note that he did not say religion, which is the point in opposition to using them.


Takeover of finance by the federal government.

Obama and the Democrats, through the "bailout" legislation, have taken control of the country's financial system. Will they relinquish that control? Rather than seeing a move in that direction, each day sees the government under Obama going in the other direction. They are, in essence, nationalizing the banking system in the USA.


Takeover of industry.

Starting with two of the country's largest and most important industrial giants, Obama and the Dems have taken the reins at both General Motors and Chrysler. They are firing executives, demanding basic restructuring, and dictating what kinds of automobiles are to be built. I see in the future an attempt to produce "green", or "environmentally  sensitive" automobiles.


Takeover of energy.

Using the shell game of "cap and trade" of carbon emissions, Obama and the Dems are about to strike terror into the hearts of energy company executives. Not only that, but using these laws, they will be able to control every other industry in the country, whether energy related or not. They insist on shutting down the use of coal and oil, opting instead for solar and wind production of electrical energy. But, guess what? The environmentalists, who for years have clamored for solar and wind energy, are now opposing those types of energy production, as well, insisting that they wreck the environment. Stay tuned on this one -- it's going to get really nasty!


Takeover of health care.

In the name of getting good care to all, including the currently uninsured, Obama and the Dems are rushing through a healthcare package without debate and without knowing how to pay for it. They are already talking about how to control the improper use of healthcare by citizens, meaning that they will ration healthcare to whom, and how, they see fit. Like other socialist countries, patients will be waiting months or years for surgeries, even after they are approved. Many will be turned down as unnecessary.

I forsee not only the rationing of healthcare, but also determintations by the government as to who will receive certain types of care. Those who are not productive will be moved to the bottom of the list, and then removed from it. Better to keep productive workers healthy than sustain the lives of non-productive people, such as the disabled, the chronically ill, those with serious diseases, and the elderly.


Takeover of education.

Liberals and leftists already control the public schools in this country. Our children are being groomed to feel good about themselves whether or not they are learning, and are being unleashed on the workforce without a work ethic or a goal of doing their jobs correctly. Socialism is the theme underlying all school courses, rather than the subjects themselves.

Liberals have attempted to shut down charter schools, private schools, and homeschooling in the past, and will no doubt work overtime to do this in the future. They must have the children in order to brainwash them into socialism. They will attempt to control the children from birth. I remember hearing Hillary Clinton say when her husband was president, something to the effect that children are set in their ways by the age of four, and the government needed to reach them before that age. Look for a major push in this direction.


Takeover of religion.

The liberals already have a stranglehold on churches by denying them tax exempt status if they say something political. Oddly, liberals (Democrats) campaign openly every election cycle in black churches, but insist that others cannot speak of politics in a church gathering.

The current push for "hate crimes" legislation is an overt attempt to stifle pastors from speaking out against the sin of homosexuality. Once this law is passed, preachers and Bible teachers everywhere will be gagged, or else punished, for teaching what the Holy Bible says about homosexuality.


Removal of guns from the masses.

Obama has promised to help the Democrats further restrict the ability to own firearms and munitons in America, stripping away Second Amdendment rights provided by the country's founding fathers. With the government forcing its way into every aspect of the citizens' lives, they fear a backlash as the freedoms disappear. It is imperative that the guns be removed from the hands of the citizens before they realize what has happened to their freedoms. The founding fathers wanted the citizens to own and bear arms to protect themselves from a tyrannical government.


Over-taxation of the wealthy.

I am not wealthy. However, I do object to the socialist plans of Obama and the Dems to over-tax the wealthy and give it to the poor. I am a believer in what Jesus and His disciples taught -- that is, that we are to help those in need. However, in scripture it is taught as a voluntary act of love and selflessness, and not something coerced.

This socialist plan, and that is exactly what it is, destroys the ambition to do better. In fact, with a certain class of people -- those who don't want to work to begin with -- this is a terrific disincentive to work. Why work when Obama and his Democrats will supply you with the fruits of someone else's labors? By the way, what about the discincentive for those productive people? Why should they knock themselves out to make a fortune when the government will promptly take it away from them?

So, we blather on about the spending bill and its consequences, taxation of the rich, and the flyover in New York City, while the Democrats manipulate the future of the country while our attention is focused elsewhere.

My sense of things is that much of what is going on in the media is a deliberate distraction by Obama and the Democrats to keep our eyes on the wrong hand. Obama is a master of prestidigitation, and we better keep our eyes on his left hand. There is where the real trouble is brewing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Hype and Chains

In a story on nytimes.com dated February 2, 2009, found at this URL:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/03/us/politics/03lobby.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/H/Health%20and%20Human%20Services%20Department

"And so in these opening days of the administration, the Obama team finds itself being criticized by bloggers on the left and the right, mocked by television comics and questioned by reporters about whether Mr. Obama is really changing the way Washington works or just changing which political party works it."

I never voted for Barack Hussein Obama. I never believed in his nebulous, undefined slogans of "Hope and Change" and "Hope You Can Believe In". Those were just political messages intended to resonate with the yearning masses who wanted to be free from business as usual in Washington.

I predicted at the time that the only change would be from a conservative Republican leadership to a socialist Democrat leadership. That's exactly what we got. Now, we are saddled with the Democrats running both the executive and legistlative branches of our government, and ramming one socialist piece of legistlation after another down our throats faster than we can swallow the previous one.

I recognized Obama's "hope and change" slogan for what it really was -- hype and chains.

While hyping the idea that he might usher in a more ethical government with better people, he instead opted for the same old Democrat players with all of their attendand tax problems and ethically challenged special interests. While hyping that he intended to represent the ordinary, everyday working citizens, instead of tossing out the lobbyists, he just traded the Republican set for a Democrat set. While hyping that he would make American strong and respected in the world again, he ran all over the world apologizing and declaring that the United States of America was a terrible country, a country of Muslim-haters and abusers of innocent civilians in other countries. While hyping that he would stand up to our enemies, he instead made a point of befriending the despots and tyrants who have plagued the world for decades.

That was the hype portion of the slogan.

On the chains side, Obama made sure that Republicans and conservatives have no voice in his government. Debate is cut off, and legislation is rammed through, not only without debate, but without even being read by those who are voting on it! As quickly as possible, our freedoms are being abolished. The free markets are being bought up by government loans with powerful steel cables -- forget strings! -- attached, resulting in the Obama administration running those companies foolish enough to buy into the strategy.

I am predicting nothing less than the takeover by government of all major facets of American life: finance, energy, transportaiton, industry, healthcare, education and even religion.

We will borrow only what the government says that we can borrow, use only the amount and types of energy that the government approves, travel only in the types of transportation that the government allows, perform only the work that government says we should perform, receive only the kinds and amounts of healthcare that the government dictates, be schooled in only those things that the government says are important, and religiously speak and practice only those things that the government decides are not destructive and are conducive to the liberal, leftist view of America and the world.

My sense of things is that Obama's hope and change is really hype and chains for the average American citizen.

I am gravely concerned for our freedoms and the future of this once-great country.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Non-Partisan Democrats

 

I am seeing a pattern emerge from the Democrats in control of our country.

In the Holy Bible, Jesus said of a hypocritical group of religious leaders, "they are blind leaders of the blind".

This aptly describes the Democrat party and its leadership of the United States of America.

On April 22, I heard two stories on NPR (National Progressive Radio) that reinforced this for me.

The first (you can read and hear it here):

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103377154&ft=1&f=1003) was Senator Carl Levin, (D-MI), speaking to NPR's Robert Siegel.

"I really think it's important that the Justice Department make the decision as to who, if anybody, is prosecuted here, and we ought to keep that out of politics."

How magnanimous!

We are going to keep politics out of this, the good Democrat says, by turning it over to the Democrat Attorney General, Eric Holder, appointed by Democrat Barak Hussein Obama. How non-partisan!

Then I heard another story the same day, about the pill referred to as "The morning after pill", or Plan B, as if the George W. Bush administration had removed science from the decision not to offer this pill, without prescription, over the counter, to girls younger than 18. You can read about it here:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103387012

Here are some excerpts that show that the Bush administration was being cast as anti-science:

"U.S. District Judge Edward Korman ruled last month in a lawsuit filed in New York that Bush administration appointees let politics, not science, drive their decision to restrict over-the-counter access."

"It's a good indication that the agency will move expeditiously to ensure its policy on Plan B is based solely on science," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the lawsuit.

"Among many in the medical community, it came to symbolize the decline of science at the agency because top FDA managers refused to go along with the recommendations of scientific staff and outside advisers that the drug be made available with no age restrictions."

There was more, but you get the idea. When a Republican administration makes a decision, it is political, and disregards science. When a Democrat administration makes a decision, it is science, and non-partisan.

Republican or conservative  = anti-science, political, partisan
Democrat or leftist, socialist = pro-science, apolitical, non-partisan

We saw this same arrogance when George W. Bush was actually blamed for Hurricane Katrina because he would not sign the Kyoto Accords. We see it when the Democrats proclaim global warming to be man-made, despite historical records that show periodic swings in temperature over time, with or without man's influences; and, despite many scientists who say that there is no evidence that man-made activities have any impact on this fluctuation.

Jesus also said that "if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch."

Who are you following? Nancy Pelosi? John Conyers? Chuck Schumer? Carl Levin? Dianne Feinstein? Do you see that deep ditch ahead? No?

My sense of things is that the Democrats are the most partisan of partisans. There is nothing non-partisan about them at all.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leftists Want Control Of Newsprint Industry

The leftist Democrats want to control everything in America, including the newsprint industry.
 
Rosa Brooks, before leaving her leftist columnist stint for an advisory position in the Department of Defense, suggested that newspapers be "bailed out", and mentions the idea of "licensing" newspapers, and making them "non-partisan", in the public interest.
 
Well, we saw how well that worked out with the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR). We know that the Democrats are pushing for the "fairness doctrine" in order to control talk radio.
 
They have also suggested that the government should control the Internet.
 
Now, two Senators are pushing for control of newspapers. Read the article on The Washington Times. Senators John Kerry, Democrat from Massachusetts, and Senator Benjamin L. Cardin, Democrat from Maryland, seem to have this on their minds. Senator Cardin has introduced the "Newspaper Revitalization Act", which would make such newspapers "nonprofit", and ostensibly, non-partisan. The Democrats' idea of non-partisan means that the leftist agenda is pushed, while conservative views are ridiculed, satirized, and branded as incompetent and bad for the country.
 
Please be aware of how the Democrat-controlled government wants to control the news outlets!
 
My sense of things is that this country, under Obama and the Democrats, is becoming more and more like Germany under Adolf Hitler.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Contempt For America

President Barrack Hussein Obama continues to show his contempt for the American way of life.
 
Having already offended about half the citizens of this county by running around the world with his apologies for America's corruption and destruction of the rest of the world, and having reached out to the likes of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he now returns to America to further stir the pot.
 
I am talking about his release of the CIA memos about interrogation techniques such as waterboarding. He "reluctantly" released them, and rushed to reassure CIA employees that he had no plans to go after any of them. This is how he operates, and I don't like it at all. He was once more rewarding his supporters, who have long howled for the release of the information and prosecution of the Bush administration. Sure enough, he didn't waste any time saying that the lawyers who approved the legality of the procedures could be prosecuted.
 
It is not in the best interests of this country for a current administration to start prosecuting the former administration. This is a political ploy, straight up, and it demeans the American way of government. What is to stop the next conservative president from going after the Obama administration? I really don't believe that they will, because the Republicans generally do not stoop to those levels. But, who knows, if the Democrats turn this into a political witch hunt, whether the next conservative administration might decide to go tit for tat?
 
The election is the American way of taking care of dissatisfaction with the course of politics. If we start arresting previous administrations and putting them in jail, we have lost our way.
 
To me, this is just another facet of President Obama's contempt for the traditional American way of life.
 
My sense of things is that this is not going to be good for America.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »